Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 6 — part 2

Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti

Vote
Paragraph 6 — part 2
Decision
No. 2 of the sitting of 30 Apr 2026
Result
370 for · 180 against · 19 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
30 April 2026, 13:08
More facts (6)
Position
vote 7 of 19 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: ECR, Patriots
Official label
RC-B10-0209/2026 – § 6/2
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0220
Dossier
2026/2702(RSP)
Vote id
192359
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 370 for, 180 against, 19 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 65 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “urges host countries to halt deportations to Haiti;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 27Against 0Abst. 0No vote 19 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 43Against 2Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
S&DFor 105Against 0Abst. 7No vote 23 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
RenewFor 60Against 5Abst. 0No vote 12 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
EPPFor 129Against 8Abst. 0No vote 48 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
ECRFor 0Against 67Abst. 1No vote 13 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 0Against 64Abst. 0No vote 21 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 1No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 6Against 11Abst. 10No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Czechia001
Germany0140
France010
Italy010
Lithuania010
Poland020
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 569 members

No vote recorded, 150

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 150 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 108 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote419 for, 198 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.93 541 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAmendment426 for, 180 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriots, Renewr · shared0.92 510 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital P — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote419 for, 158 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.92 490 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 475 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital Q — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote421 for, 150 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.91 496 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 67 — part 2 2023 and 2024 reports on UkraineSplit vote428 for, 173 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.91 506 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 177, point vii — part 2 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionSplit vote446 for, 193 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.91 557 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 10 — part 6 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineSplit vote415 for, 167 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 492 voters
23 Oct 2025Paragraph 16 — part 3 Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola SummitSplit vote391 for, 175 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 481 voters
9 Sept 2025Recital AH — part 2 of 2 Public procurementSplit vote448 for, 186 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.90 510 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 5 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192359
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 6 — part 2 — Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti”. Vote, 30 April 2026. votingId 192359, reference 2026/2702(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192359 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-30/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-30-192359,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 6 — part 2 — Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-30},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192359}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192359},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192359, reference 2026/2702(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30 (CC BY 4.0)}
}