Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 8, after paragraph 5

Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti

Vote
Amendment 8, after paragraph 5
Decision
No. 2 of the sitting of 30 Apr 2026
Result
84 for · 464 against · 11 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
30 April 2026, 13:07
More facts (6)
Position
vote 2 of 19 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
RC-B10-0209/2026 – After § 5 – Am 8
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0220
Dossier
2026/2702(RSP)
Vote id
192354
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 84 for, 464 against, 11 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 15 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 27Against 0Abst. 0No vote 19 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 1No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 2Against 108Abst. 0No vote 25 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 0Against 65Abst. 0No vote 12 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 0Against 133Abst. 1No vote 51 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 0Against 68Abst. 0No vote 13 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 64Abst. 0No vote 21 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 2Against 18Abst. 1No vote 6 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
No groupFor 10Against 8Abst. 8No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium030
Czechia070
Denmark010
Spain030
France0270
Greece010
Italy040
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Poland030
Portugal020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 559 members

No vote recorded, 160

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 160 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Oct 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 8 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024Amendment101 for, 501 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.93 472 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 124 to Article 19, After paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) Generalised scheme of tariff preferencesAmendment95 for, 551 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 541 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 1, adding text after recital D The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment112 for, 485 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 488 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 56 to recital D The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 470 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 475 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 26 to paragraph 38 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment100 for, 551 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 524 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 24 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment98 for, 513 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 498 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 483 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 5 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment108 for, 548 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 523 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 37 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment107 for, 538 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 522 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 5 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192354
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 8, after paragraph 5 — Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti”. Vote, 30 April 2026. votingId 192354, reference 2026/2702(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192354 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-30/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-30-192354,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 8, after paragraph 5 — Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-30},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192354}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192354},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192354, reference 2026/2702(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30 (CC BY 4.0)}
}