Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 5, after paragraph 4

Ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine

Vote
Amendment 5, after paragraph 4
Decision
No. 11 of the sitting of 30 Apr 2026
Result
262 for · 216 against · 91 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
30 April 2026, 13:33
More facts (6)
Position
vote 1 of 22 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
RC-B10-0201/2026 – After § 4 – Am 5
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0202
Dossier
2026/2700(RSP)
Vote id
192322
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 262 for, 216 against, 91 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 46 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 35Abst. 0No vote 11 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 1Against 43Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 4Against 102Abst. 2No vote 27 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
RenewFor 6Against 14Abst. 45No vote 12 of 77Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.54
EPPFor 134Against 2Abst. 0No vote 49 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 62Against 0Abst. 3No vote 16 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
PatriotsFor 48Against 2Abst. 15No vote 20 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.61
ESNFor 5Against 5Abst. 14No vote 3 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.38
No groupFor 2Against 13Abst. 12No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria001
Czechia120
Germany053
France100
Greece022
Luxembourg010
Poland001
Romania002
Slovakia033

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 569 members

No vote recorded, 150

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 150 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Sept 2024Final vote — text as a whole Situation in VenezuelaFinal309 for, 201 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 59 %Requested by EPP, The Leftr · shared0.88 421 voters
22 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Final260 for, 194 against, 110 abstained Adopted For 46 %r · shared0.85 457 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 227 + 285 (voted as one) to recital 19 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 269 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.83 516 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 305 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment358 for, 277 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.83 519 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 226 + 284 (voted as one) to recital 18 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment363 for, 276 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.83 520 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 225 + 283 (voted as one) to recital 14 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment365 for, 271 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.83 520 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 239 + 299 (voted as one) to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment362 for, 276 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.83 519 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 311 + 398 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment365 for, 276 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by Greens, S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.83 519 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 233 + 292 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 274 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.83 522 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 241 + 301 (voted as one) to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 273 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.83 518 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 10 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192322
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 5, after paragraph 4 — Ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine”. Vote, 30 April 2026. votingId 192322, reference 2026/2700(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192322 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-30/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-30-192322,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 5, after paragraph 4 — Ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-30},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192322}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192322},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192322, reference 2026/2700(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30 (CC BY 4.0)}
}