Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Recital I — part 2

The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment

Vote
Recital I — part 2
Decision
No. 13 of the sitting of 30 Apr 2026
Result
378 for · 161 against · 12 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
30 April 2026, 13:38
More facts (6)
Position
vote 10 of 20 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: Patriots
Official label
RC-B10-0206/2026 – Recital I/2
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0235
Dossier
2026/2693(RSP)
Vote id
192305
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 378 for, 161 against, 12 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 69 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “whereas on 9 December 2021, the Commission proposed adding “hate crime” to the list of EU crimes laid down in Article 83(1) TFEU; whereas this proposal did not garner the necessary unanimous support among Member States;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 31Against 1Abst. 0No vote 14 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
GreensFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 106Against 0Abst. 0No vote 29 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 60Against 3Abst. 0No vote 14 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 123Against 1Abst. 4No vote 57 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 8Against 55Abst. 3No vote 15 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
PatriotsFor 0Against 67Abst. 0No vote 18 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 1Against 20Abst. 0No vote 6 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 7Against 14Abst. 5No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria400
Belgium300
Bulgaria300
Cyprus100
Czechia500
Germany2100
Denmark011
Estonia200
Spain1500
Finland300
France203
Greece200
Croatia200
Hungary400
Ireland400
Italy500
Lithuania300
Luxembourg200
Netherlands400
Poland2000
Portugal300
Romania700
Sweden500
Slovenia300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 551 members

No vote recorded, 168

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 168 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 67 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote418 for, 197 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.91 526 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Final416 for, 190 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.91 526 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionFinal418 for, 207 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.90 529 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 18 — part 1 Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economiesSplit vote444 for, 153 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.90 474 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAmendment426 for, 180 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriots, Renewr · shared0.90 493 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital P — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote419 for, 158 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.90 477 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 65 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote444 for, 185 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.90 485 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 92 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote427 for, 195 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 534 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 7 — part 2 Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostagesSplit vote437 for, 158 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 471 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 10 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote427 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.90 484 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 3 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192305
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Recital I — part 2 — The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment”. Vote, 30 April 2026. votingId 192305, reference 2026/2693(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192305 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-30/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-30-192305,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital I — part 2 — The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-30},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192305}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192305},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192305, reference 2026/2693(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30 (CC BY 4.0)}
}