Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 16

The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 16
Decision
No. 13 of the sitting of 30 Apr 2026
Result
330 for · 111 against · 117 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
30 April 2026, 13:37
More facts (6)
Position
vote 8 of 20 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
RC-B10-0206/2026 – § 16
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0235
Dossier
2026/2693(RSP)
Vote id
192302
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 330 for, 111 against, 117 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 59 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 26Abst. 3No vote 15 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
GreensFor 2Against 40Abst. 1No vote 10 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
S&DFor 98Against 6Abst. 2No vote 29 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
RenewFor 52Against 9Abst. 2No vote 14 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.74
EPPFor 128Against 2Abst. 2No vote 53 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 7Against 4Abst. 57No vote 13 of 81Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.76
PatriotsFor 31Against 15Abst. 21No vote 18 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.19
ESNFor 0Against 2Abst. 20No vote 5 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.86
No groupFor 10Against 7Abst. 9No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Germany030
Denmark010
Spain040
Finland011
France060
Ireland210
Italy050
Netherlands010
Portugal020
Sweden002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 558 members

No vote recorded, 161

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 161 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 Jan 2025Final vote on the draft Council decision EU/Republic of Serbia agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of SerbiaFinal505 for, 90 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.67 495 voters
12 Mar 2025Final vote on the draft Council decision Agreement between Canada and the European Union on the transfer and processing of Passenger Name Record (PNR) dataFinal521 for, 90 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.65 505 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 150 to Article 6 — part 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment438 for, 196 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.63 497 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation AgreementFinal493 for, 104 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.63 518 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 5 — part 1 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Split vote467 for, 116 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.63 478 voters
22 May 2025Final vote Amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation as regards securities financing transactions under the net stable funding ratioFinal436 for, 149 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.63 468 voters
8 Jul 2026Paragraph 101 — part 1 2025 Commission report on UkraineSplit vote447 for, 130 against, 78 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.62 516 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 2 — part 1 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Split vote480 for, 112 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.62 481 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 137 to Article 6, paragraph 3, alinéa 1 — part 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment451 for, 182 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.62 500 voters
9 Sept 2025Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation AgreementFinal473 for, 114 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.62 501 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 3 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192302
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: paragraph 16 — The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment”. Vote, 30 April 2026. votingId 192302, reference 2026/2693(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192302 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-30/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-30-192302,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 16 — The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-30},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192302}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192302},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192302, reference 2026/2693(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30 (CC BY 4.0)}
}