Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 7 — part 2

The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment

Vote
Paragraph 7 — part 2
Result
380 for · 173 against · 7 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
30 April 2026, 13:37
More facts (6)
Position
vote 4 of 20 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: Patriots
Official label
RC-B10-0206/2026 – § 7/2
Vote id
192298
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 380 for, 173 against, 7 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 68 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “reiterates its support for adding hate crime, which could cover the most severe forms of cyberbullying, to the list of EU crimes under Article 83(1) TFEU;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 29Against 1Abst. 0No vote 16 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 108Against 0Abst. 0No vote 27 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 63Against 1Abst. 0No vote 13 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 129Against 0Abst. 5No vote 51 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 2Against 66Abst. 0No vote 13 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 1Against 66Abst. 0No vote 18 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 0Against 21Abst. 0No vote 6 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 5Against 18Abst. 2No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium100
Germany300
Denmark100
Spain400
Finland200
France400
Ireland300
Italy700
Netherlands100
Portugal110
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 560 members

No vote recorded, 159

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 159 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAmendment426 for, 180 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriots, Renewr · shared0.96 501 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Final416 for, 190 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.96 535 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 10 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote427 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.96 491 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 101 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote460 for, 194 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 516 voters
26 Nov 2025Paragraph 25 — part 2 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and materialSplit vote467 for, 190 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %r · shared0.95 523 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionFinal418 for, 207 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.95 539 voters
7 May 2025Paragraph 51 — part 2 2023 and 2024 reports on TürkiyeSplit vote426 for, 192 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 481 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital P — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote419 for, 158 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.95 484 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 467 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital Q — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote421 for, 150 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.95 489 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 7 — part 2 — The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment”. Vote, 30 April 2026. votingId 192298, reference 2026/2693(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192298 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-30/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-30-192298,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 7 — part 2 — The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-30},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192298}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192298},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192298, reference 2026/2693(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30 (CC BY 4.0)}
}