Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 4, after paragraph 27

How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?

Vote
Amendment 4, after paragraph 27
Result
330 for · 218 against · 35 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
30 April 2026, 13:22
More facts (6)
Position
vote 11 of 38 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
A10-0088/2026 – Carlo Fidanza – After § 27 – Am 4
Vote id
191958
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 330 for, 218 against, 35 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 57 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 34Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 112Against 2Abst. 0No vote 21 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 58Against 7Abst. 0No vote 12 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.84
EPPFor 17Against 113Abst. 4No vote 51 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
ECRFor 3Against 61Abst. 6No vote 11 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
PatriotsFor 42Against 11Abst. 18No vote 14 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.39
ESNFor 0Against 18Abst. 5No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.67
No groupFor 19Against 6Abst. 2No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Czechia030
Germany800
France001
Greece301
Luxembourg100
Poland010
Romania020
Slovakia600

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 583 members

No vote recorded, 136

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 136 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Jun 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the S&D Group — AI Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the S&D Group – AIOther244 for, 179 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 56 %r · shared0.85 369 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment272 for, 256 against, 77 abstained Adopted For 45 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.83 507 voters
12 Mar 2025Recital H — part 2 The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaSplit vote344 for, 297 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.82 530 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 34 to paragraph 1, point ad Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment308 for, 313 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 48 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.79 539 voters
8 Oct 2025Amendment 148 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAmendment305 for, 325 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 48 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.79 522 voters
11 Mar 2026Paragraph 17 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026Split vote287 for, 278 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 47 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.79 505 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 62 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote325 for, 296 against, 33 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.79 529 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 313 to Article 17, after paragraph 1 — part 2 Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceabilityAmendment337 for, 217 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 59 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 484 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 313 to Article 17, after paragraph 1 — part 1 Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceabilityAmendment349 for, 214 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 490 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 284 to Article 2, after paragraph 2 Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceabilityAmendment301 for, 255 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 488 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 9 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 4, after paragraph 27 — How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?”. Vote, 30 April 2026. votingId 191958, reference 2025/2053(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/191958 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-30/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-30-191958,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 4, after paragraph 27 — How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-30},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/191958}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/191958},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191958, reference 2025/2053(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30 (CC BY 4.0)}
}