Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 3, after paragraph 18

How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?

Vote
Amendment 3, after paragraph 18
Result
226 for · 325 against · 28 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
30 April 2026, 13:22
More facts (6)
Position
vote 10 of 38 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
A10-0088/2026 – Carlo Fidanza – After § 18 – Am 3
Vote id
191957
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 226 for, 325 against, 28 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 39 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 42Against 70Abst. 0No vote 23 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.44
RenewFor 19Against 37Abst. 8No vote 13 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.37
EPPFor 6Against 123Abst. 5No vote 51 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
ECRFor 7Against 56Abst. 6No vote 12 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.72
PatriotsFor 55Against 12Abst. 4No vote 14 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.66
ESNFor 2Against 20Abst. 0No vote 5 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
No groupFor 15Against 7Abst. 5No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Czechia010
Germany0140
Italy010
Poland020
Slovakia200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 579 members

No vote recorded, 140

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 140 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Jan 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7 Case of Jean-Jacques Wondo in the Democratic Republic of the CongoAmendment150 for, 448 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.67 497 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 69 to paragraph 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Amendment112 for, 488 against, 59 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.65 527 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 30 to paragraph 8 — part 2 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Amendment130 for, 463 against, 77 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.64 532 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
24 Feb 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 12 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineAmendment114 for, 389 against, 93 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.64 484 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 286 to Article 4, after paragraph 1 Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceabilityAmendment177 for, 375 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.63 487 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 23 to paragraph 12 Continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggressionAmendment143 for, 492 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.63 536 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 38 to paragraph 56 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment131 for, 518 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.63 540 voters
21 Jan 2026Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 78 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025Amendment157 for, 374 against, 128 abstained Rejected For 24 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.63 539 voters
24 Oct 2024Amendment 2 to paragraph 10 Situation in Azerbaijan, violation of human rights and international law and relations with ArmeniaAmendment152 for, 394 against, 31 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.62 470 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 29 to paragraph 44 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment148 for, 500 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.62 543 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 9 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 3, after paragraph 18 — How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?”. Vote, 30 April 2026. votingId 191957, reference 2025/2053(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/191957 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-30/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-30-191957,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 3, after paragraph 18 — How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-30},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/191957}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/191957},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191957, reference 2025/2053(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30 (CC BY 4.0)}
}