Skip to content

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the whole text

How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?

Vote
Final vote on the whole text
Result
426 for · 119 against · 40 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
30 April 2026, 13:25
More facts (6)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 38 of 38 on the decision
Official label
A10-0088/2026 – Carlo Fidanza – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Vote id
190668
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 426 for, 119 against, 40 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 73 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 23Abst. 12No vote 11 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.49
GreensFor 0Against 44Abst. 1No vote 8 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 72Against 32Abst. 4No vote 27 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.50
RenewFor 44Against 16Abst. 5No vote 12 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.52
EPPFor 134Against 1Abst. 4No vote 46 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 66Against 0Abst. 5No vote 10 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
PatriotsFor 71Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 15Against 3Abst. 9No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria010
Belgium301
Bulgaria201
Germany810
Denmark220
Estonia200
Spain100
Finland200
France1210
Ireland500
Italy100
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Netherlands032
Portugal020
Romania200
Sweden010
Slovenia101
Slovakia050

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 585 members

No vote recorded, 134

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 134 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Oct 2025Final vote Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penaltiesFinal492 for, 111 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.79 526 voters
17 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 20 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSeparate vote480 for, 116 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.77 515 voters
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 1 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSplit vote478 for, 117 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.77 508 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 13 — part 1 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSplit vote490 for, 120 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.76 514 voters
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 4 — part 3 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSplit vote474 for, 126 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.76 512 voters
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 2 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSplit vote461 for, 130 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 76 %r · shared0.74 506 voters
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 5 — part 3 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSplit vote489 for, 116 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 80 %r · shared0.73 514 voters
17 Sept 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution The role of social, economic and environmental standards in safeguarding fair competition for all aquatic food products and improving food securityFinal467 for, 92 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.72 509 voters
17 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 22 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSeparate vote452 for, 119 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by Greens, The Leftr · shared0.72 511 voters
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Attack against citizens in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Attack against citizens in ModenaOther355 for, 86 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.72 388 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 9 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote on the whole text — How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?”. Vote, 30 April 2026. votingId 190668, reference 2025/2053(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/190668 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-30/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-30-190668,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-30},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/190668}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/190668},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 190668, reference 2025/2053(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30 (CC BY 4.0)}
}