Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 40 to paragraph 160, after point vii

Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission

Vote
Amendment 40 to paragraph 160, after point vii
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 29 Apr 2026
Result
362 for · 269 against · 20 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 13:24
More facts (6)
Position
vote 68 of 98 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – § 160, after point vii – Am 40
Text
Report A-10-2026-0085
Dossier
2025/2145(DEC)
Vote id
191513
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 362 for, 269 against, 20 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 56 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 28Against 11Abst. 5No vote 2 of 46Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.45
GreensFor 0Against 45Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 15Against 108Abst. 0No vote 12 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
RenewFor 18Against 46Abst. 3No vote 10 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.53
EPPFor 108Against 45Abst. 8No vote 24 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.51
ECRFor 70Against 8Abst. 3No vote 0 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
PatriotsFor 72Against 6Abst. 0No vote 7 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
ESNFor 27Against 0Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 24Against 0Abst. 1No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Czechia201
Germany800
France100
Greece200
Luxembourg100
Poland100
Romania200
Slovakia600

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 651 members

No vote recorded, 68

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 68 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 76 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Amendment265 for, 254 against, 146 abstained Adopted For 40 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.70 595 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment280 for, 292 against, 26 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.69 543 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.69 531 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 May 2025Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 8 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Amendment319 for, 255 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 54 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.69 528 voters
26 Nov 2024Amendment 1, adding text after recital K Genetically modified maize DP202216Amendment270 for, 290 against, 72 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.68 572 voters
26 Nov 2024Amendment 1, adding text after recital L Genetically modified maize DP915635Amendment270 for, 291 against, 68 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.68 570 voters
26 Nov 2024Amendment 1, adding text after recital K Genetically modified maize DP23211Amendment270 for, 292 against, 70 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.68 572 voters
13 Feb 2025Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 4 Continuing detention and risk of the death penalty for individuals in Nigeria charged with blasphemy, notably the case of Yahaya Sharif-AminuAmendment246 for, 259 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.68 474 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 3, adding text after recital B Execution spree in Iran and the confirmation of the death sentences of activists Behrouz Ehsani and Mehdi HassaniAmendment272 for, 264 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 48 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.68 507 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.67 545 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191513
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 40 to paragraph 160, after point vii — Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191513, reference 2025/2145(DEC). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191513 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191513,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 40 to paragraph 160, after point vii — Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191513}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191513},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191513, reference 2025/2145(DEC). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}