Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 17, after paragraph 81

Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission

Vote
Amendment 17, after paragraph 81
Result
190 for · 443 against · 19 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 13:21
More facts (6)
Position
vote 40 of 98 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – After § 81 – Am 17
Vote id
191481
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 190 for, 443 against, 19 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 44Abst. 0No vote 2 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 45Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 123Abst. 0No vote 12 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 67Abst. 0No vote 10 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 2Against 162Abst. 0No vote 21 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 69Against 0Abst. 11No vote 1 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
PatriotsFor 73Against 0Abst. 4No vote 8 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
ESNFor 27Against 0Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 19Against 2Abst. 4No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria600
Belgium300
Czechia204
Denmark100
Spain500
France2900
Greece100
Hungary800
Italy600
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Poland300
Portugal200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 652 members

No vote recorded, 67

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 67 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 11 to paragraph 26 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment170 for, 426 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 560 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 2 to recital A European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment191 for, 467 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 615 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment196 for, 422 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.98 616 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment201 for, 438 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 595 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 30 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote194 for, 435 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %r · shared0.98 628 voters
11 Mar 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 24 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Amendment184 for, 441 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 576 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after recital A European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 461 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 613 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 613 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 57 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAmendment200 for, 461 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 606 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 1 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment193 for, 431 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 587 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 17, after paragraph 81 — Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191481, reference 2025/2145(DEC). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191481 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191481,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 17, after paragraph 81 — Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191481}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191481},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191481, reference 2025/2145(DEC). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}