Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 49 to paragraph 20, point x

Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission

Vote
Amendment 49 to paragraph 20, point x
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 29 Apr 2026
Result
209 for · 430 against · 14 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 13:20
More facts (6)
Position
vote 33 of 98 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – § 20, point x – Am 49
Text
Report A-10-2026-0085
Dossier
2025/2145(DEC)
Vote id
191474
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 209 for, 430 against, 14 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 32 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 45Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 122Abst. 1No vote 12 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 3Against 65Abst. 0No vote 9 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 11Against 151Abst. 1No vote 22 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
ECRFor 78Against 0Abst. 3No vote 0 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 72Against 0Abst. 6No vote 7 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
ESNFor 27Against 0Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 18Against 4Abst. 3No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria010
Czechia300
Germany611
France010
Greece011
Luxembourg100
Poland001
Romania200
Slovakia600

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 653 members

No vote recorded, 66

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 66 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 612 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 463 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 612 voters
25 Nov 2025Amendment 14 to paragraph 12 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment194 for, 439 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 592 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Amendment 119, adding text after paragraph 50 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment198 for, 463 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 604 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 63, adding text after paragraph 40 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment207 for, 418 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.96 629 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 52 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAmendment187 for, 452 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 595 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 8 to paragraph 21 The European Water Resilience StrategyAmendment205 for, 427 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Members, Greensr · shared0.96 569 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 19 Discharge 2024: AgenciesAmendment200 for, 432 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 633 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 39 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment186 for, 446 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 626 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 31 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment206 for, 428 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.96 634 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191474
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 49 to paragraph 20, point x — Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191474, reference 2025/2145(DEC). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191474 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191474,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 49 to paragraph 20, point x — Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191474}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191474},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191474, reference 2025/2145(DEC). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}