Skip to content

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the whole text

Discharge 2024: European Public Prosecutor’s Office

Vote
Final vote on the whole text
Result
454 for · 161 against · 29 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:00
More facts (6)
Effect
Discharge decision adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 9 of 9 on the decision
Official label
A10-0050/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Vote id
190339
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 454 for, 161 against, 29 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 70 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Discharge decision adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 1Abst. 1No vote 2 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 119Against 1Abst. 0No vote 15 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 65Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 163Against 0Abst. 1No vote 21 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 6Against 59Abst. 13No vote 3 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.63
PatriotsFor 4Against 59Abst. 13No vote 9 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.66
ESNFor 0Against 27Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 14Abst. 1No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium030
Czechia016
Denmark010
Spain050
France0290
Greece010
Hungary007
Italy410
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Poland030
Portugal020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 644 members

No vote recorded, 75

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 75 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Paragraph 18 — part 2 Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s OfficeSplit vote459 for, 171 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 70 %r · shared0.93 582 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 11 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote430 for, 157 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.92 548 voters
22 Jan 2026Separate vote on paragraph 6 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSeparate vote424 for, 158 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.91 552 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Recital P — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote419 for, 158 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.91 544 voters
7 May 2025Paragraph 18 — part 3 Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s OfficeSplit vote458 for, 154 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.91 564 voters
7 May 2025Paragraph 8 — part 2 Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s OfficeSplit vote456 for, 185 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 585 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 10 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote427 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.91 550 voters
20 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 2 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseSeparate vote435 for, 190 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.91 586 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 3, adding text after Recital B — part 1 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024Amendment453 for, 171 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 610 voters
20 May 2026Separate vote on citation 7 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseSeparate vote426 for, 192 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 583 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 2 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote on the whole text — Discharge 2024: European Public Prosecutor’s Office”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 190339, reference 2025/2155(DEC). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/190339 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-190339,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — Discharge 2024: European Public Prosecutor’s Office}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/190339}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/190339},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 190339, reference 2025/2155(DEC). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}