Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Final vote on the whole text

Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European Union

Vote
Final vote on the whole text
Result
526 for · 79 against · 47 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 13:49
More facts (5)
Position
vote 8 of 8 on the decision
Official label
A10-0055/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Vote id
190196
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 526 for, 79 against, 47 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 81 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 121Against 2Abst. 0No vote 12 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 66Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 165Against 1Abst. 0No vote 19 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 46Against 13Abst. 19No vote 3 of 81Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.38
PatriotsFor 5Against 56Abst. 17No vote 7 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.58
ESNFor 19Against 3Abst. 5No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.56
No groupFor 17Against 4Abst. 6No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Bulgaria500
Cyprus200
Czechia500
Germany2710
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain1800
Finland400
France500
Greece600
Croatia400
Hungary600
Ireland400
Italy700
Lithuania300
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta100
Netherlands400
Poland2200
Portugal700
Romania800
Sweden500
Slovenia500
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 652 members

No vote recorded, 67

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 67 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Committee of the RegionsFinal567 for, 70 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 87 %r · shared0.82 643 voters
18 Jun 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesFinal437 for, 112 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.80 525 voters
10 Sept 2025Final vote — text as a whole Role of cohesion policy in supporting the just transitionFinal519 for, 99 against, 48 abstained Adopted For 78 %r · shared0.77 601 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Separate vote on recital A The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersSeparate vote459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.77 536 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.76 543 voters
21 Oct 2025Final vote on the provisional agreement Common data platform on chemicals, establishing a monitoring and outlook framework for chemicalsFinal471 for, 123 against, 48 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.75 586 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Discharge 2024: Joint UndertakingsFinal525 for, 104 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 81 %r · shared0.75 640 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital AP Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote472 for, 130 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.75 583 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: AgenciesFinal503 for, 121 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.75 582 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: AgenciesFinal475 for, 107 against, 71 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.74 646 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 5 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote on the whole text — Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European Union”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 190196, reference 2025/2148(DEC). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/190196 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-190196,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European Union}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/190196}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/190196},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 190196, reference 2025/2148(DEC). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}