Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 109 — part 2

Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034

Vote
Paragraph 109 — part 2
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 28 Apr 2026
Result
449 for · 194 against · 9 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 13:32
More facts (6)
Position
vote 115 of 150 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN · split vote: ESN · separate vote: Patriots
Official label
A10-0105/2026 – Siegfried Mureşan, Carla Tavares – § 109/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0105
Dossier
2025/0571R
Vote id
190515
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 449 for, 194 against, 9 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 69 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 5Abst. 1No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 124Against 1Abst. 0No vote 10 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 69Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 165Against 0Abst. 0No vote 20 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 3Against 66Abst. 5No vote 7 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
PatriotsFor 1Against 76Abst. 0No vote 8 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 0Against 26Abst. 1No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 5Against 20Abst. 2No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia001
Germany0150
France010
Hungary010
Italy010
Lithuania010
Poland020
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 652 members

No vote recorded, 67

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 67 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Separate vote on citation 7 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseSeparate vote426 for, 192 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 591 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAmendment426 for, 180 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriots, Renewr · shared0.95 576 voters
20 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 2 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseSeparate vote435 for, 190 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.95 595 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 101 — part 3 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote463 for, 194 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 604 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionFinal418 for, 207 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.94 617 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Final416 for, 190 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.94 599 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 10 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote427 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.94 559 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 101 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote460 for, 194 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 603 voters
19 Jun 2025Paragraph 33 — part 2 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote405 for, 169 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.94 527 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 150 to Article 6 — part 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment452 for, 195 against, 2 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.94 589 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190515
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 109 — part 2 — Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 190515, reference 2025/0571R. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190515 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-190515,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 109 — part 2 — Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190515}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190515},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 190515, reference 2025/0571R. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}