Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 106

Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 106
Result
443 for · 196 against · 14 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 13:31
More facts (6)
Position
vote 109 of 150 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR · separate vote: Patriots
Official label
A10-0105/2026 – Siegfried Mureşan, Carla Tavares – § 106
Dossier
2025/0571R
Vote id
190509
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 443 for, 196 against, 14 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 68 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 5Abst. 2No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.76
GreensFor 44Against 1Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 123Against 3Abst. 0No vote 9 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 70Against 1Abst. 0No vote 6 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 164Against 2Abst. 1No vote 18 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 1Against 62Abst. 7No vote 11 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
PatriotsFor 0Against 77Abst. 0No vote 8 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 1No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 5Against 20Abst. 3No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Bulgaria200
Cyprus100
Germany1400
Denmark030
Estonia200
Spain1900
Finland200
France1300
Greece300
Croatia300
Hungary200
Ireland100
Italy1900
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Malta100
Netherlands300
Poland300
Portugal800
Romania1000
Sweden500
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 653 members

No vote recorded, 66

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 66 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 2 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseSeparate vote435 for, 190 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.94 596 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAmendment426 for, 180 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriots, Renewr · shared0.94 577 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionFinal418 for, 207 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.93 618 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Final416 for, 190 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.93 599 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 101 — part 3 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote463 for, 194 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 609 voters
20 May 2026Separate vote on citation 7 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseSeparate vote426 for, 192 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 591 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 10 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote427 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.93 558 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 101 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote460 for, 194 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 608 voters
30 Apr 2026Paragraph 7 — part 2 The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassmentSplit vote380 for, 173 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 542 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 101 — part 4 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote459 for, 195 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 605 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: paragraph 106 — Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 190509, reference 2025/0571R. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190509 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-190509,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 106 — Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190509}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190509},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 190509, reference 2025/0571R. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}