Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 71, after paragraph 39

Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034

Vote
Amendment 71, after paragraph 39
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 28 Apr 2026
Result
224 for · 430 against · 2 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 13:24
More facts (6)
Position
vote 69 of 150 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0105/2026 – Siegfried Mureşan, Carla Tavares – After § 39 – Am 71
Text
Report A-10-2026-0105
Dossier
2025/0571R
Vote id
190480
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 224 for, 430 against, 2 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 34 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 3Against 43Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
S&DFor 5Against 120Abst. 1No vote 9 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
RenewFor 6Against 65Abst. 0No vote 6 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
EPPFor 12Against 152Abst. 0No vote 21 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
ECRFor 73Against 0Abst. 1No vote 7 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 77Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 27Against 0Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 21Against 7Abst. 0No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium110
Czechia010
Germany0140
Denmark030
Spain020
Finland020
France120
Croatia010
Italy130
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Sweden020
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 656 members

No vote recorded, 63

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 63 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 26 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment214 for, 434 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.94 650 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 52, adding text after paragraph 11 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment212 for, 448 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.94 605 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 10 Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditureAmendment201 for, 453 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 609 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 63, adding text after paragraph 40 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment207 for, 418 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.93 617 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 18 Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment213 for, 421 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 583 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 86 to paragraph 171, after point vi Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment208 for, 438 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 591 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 18 Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment199 for, 372 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 535 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 73, adding text after recital H The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 531 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 112 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment207 for, 410 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.93 609 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 19 Discharge 2024: AgenciesAmendment203 for, 434 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 618 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190480
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 71, after paragraph 39 — Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 190480, reference 2025/0571R. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190480 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-190480,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 71, after paragraph 39 — Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190480}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190480},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 190480, reference 2025/0571R. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}