Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 88, after paragraph 21

Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034

Vote
Amendment 88, after paragraph 21
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 28 Apr 2026
Result
230 for · 408 against · 16 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 13:18
More facts (6)
Position
vote 31 of 150 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0105/2026 – Siegfried Mureşan, Carla Tavares – After § 21 – Am 88
Text
Report A-10-2026-0105
Dossier
2025/0571R
Vote id
190449
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 230 for, 408 against, 16 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 35 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 4Abst. 2No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
GreensFor 8Against 36Abst. 2No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.67
S&DFor 0Against 124Abst. 1No vote 10 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 0Against 69Abst. 2No vote 6 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 0Against 166Abst. 0No vote 19 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 66Against 4Abst. 3No vote 8 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
PatriotsFor 74Against 1Abst. 1No vote 9 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
ESNFor 23Against 2Abst. 2No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.78
No groupFor 23Against 2Abst. 3No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria300
Czechia100
Germany1122
France100
Hungary100
Italy100
Lithuania100
Poland200
Slovakia200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 654 members

No vote recorded, 65

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 65 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Jul 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion of censure on the CommissionFinal175 for, 360 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 32 %r · shared0.92 506 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 179 + 385 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment222 for, 415 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greens, The Left, Patriotsr · shared0.89 588 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 186 + 387 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment223 for, 416 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greens, The Left, Patriotsr · shared0.89 588 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendments 188 + 388 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment229 for, 407 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by Greens, The Leftr · shared0.88 588 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 7, adding text after recital V 2025 Commission report on UkraineAmendment211 for, 425 against, 27 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 607 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 178 + 384 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment225 for, 412 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greens, The Left, Patriotsr · shared0.87 590 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s OfficeAmendment209 for, 413 against, 38 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.87 595 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 4 The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaAmendment235 for, 389 against, 40 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 596 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 91, adding text after paragraph 183 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment225 for, 387 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 577 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 251 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment251 for, 354 against, 49 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.86 591 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190449
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 88, after paragraph 21 — Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 190449, reference 2025/0571R. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190449 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-190449,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 88, after paragraph 21 — Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190449}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190449},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 190449, reference 2025/0571R. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}