Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 85, after paragraph 11

Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034

Vote
Amendment 85, after paragraph 11
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 28 Apr 2026
Result
168 for · 434 against · 50 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 13:16
More facts (6)
Position
vote 19 of 150 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0105/2026 – Siegfried Mureşan, Carla Tavares – After § 11 – Am 85
Text
Report A-10-2026-0105
Dossier
2025/0571R
Vote id
190440
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 168 for, 434 against, 50 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 26 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 32Against 2Abst. 6No vote 6 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.70
GreensFor 9Against 35Abst. 2No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.64
S&DFor 13Against 112Abst. 1No vote 9 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
RenewFor 0Against 71Abst. 0No vote 6 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 0Against 165Abst. 1No vote 19 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 11Against 39Abst. 24No vote 7 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.29
PatriotsFor 62Against 1Abst. 13No vote 9 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.72
ESNFor 19Against 4Abst. 2No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.64
No groupFor 22Against 5Abst. 1No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium110
Czechia010
Germany0140
Denmark030
Spain002
Finland020
France300
Croatia010
Italy400
Lithuania010
Luxembourg100
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Sweden020
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 652 members

No vote recorded, 67

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 67 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Mar 2026Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Australia Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – AustraliaOther134 for, 350 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.82 460 voters
10 Jul 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion of censure on the CommissionFinal175 for, 360 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 32 %r · shared0.82 503 voters
10 Feb 2026Proposal to vote on amendments Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural productsProcedural206 for, 430 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %r · shared0.80 595 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion of censure on the CommissionFinal165 for, 390 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.78 523 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 26 to paragraph 40 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment136 for, 487 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.78 593 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendments 25 + 34 (voted as one) to paragraph 37 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment191 for, 423 against, 48 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.78 608 voters
13 Feb 2025Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 Further deterioration of the political situation in GeorgiaAmendment142 for, 405 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 500 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 91, adding text after paragraph 25 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment137 for, 478 against, 62 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 607 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 10 Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member StatesAmendment151 for, 429 against, 37 abstained Rejected For 24 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 562 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 7 Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member StatesAmendment166 for, 430 against, 27 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.76 566 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190440
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 85, after paragraph 11 — Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 190440, reference 2025/0571R. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190440 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-190440,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 85, after paragraph 11 — Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190440}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190440},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 190440, reference 2025/0571R. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}