Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 139, after Recital 27

Generalised scheme of tariff preferences

Vote
Amendment 139, after Recital 27
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 28 Apr 2026
Result
171 for · 465 against · 10 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 13:59
More facts (6)
Position
vote 29 of 35 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
A9-0147/2022 – Bernd Lange – After Recital 27 – Am 139
Text
Report A-9-2022-0147
Dossier
2021/0297(COD)
Vote id
190418
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 171 for, 465 against, 10 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 26 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 46Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 121Abst. 0No vote 14 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 70Abst. 0No vote 7 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 5Against 156Abst. 0No vote 24 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 71Against 2Abst. 0No vote 8 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 57Against 20Abst. 0No vote 8 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.61
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 1No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 12Against 7Abst. 9No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium300
Bulgaria100
Cyprus100
Czechia300
Denmark100
Estonia100
Spain200
Finland100
France400
Greece200
Croatia100
Italy1900
Lithuania200
Latvia210
Netherlands300
Poland1700
Romania510
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 646 members

No vote recorded, 73

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 73 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Amendment 1 to paragraph 5 Post-election situation in Uganda and threats against opposition leader Bobi WineAmendment155 for, 391 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 515 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 11 to paragraph 26 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment170 for, 426 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 553 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 102, adding text after paragraph 53 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment178 for, 463 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 597 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 47 EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution)Amendment185 for, 446 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 598 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 165, adding text after paragraph 63 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment176 for, 444 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.91 591 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 20 to paragraph 55 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Amendment186 for, 458 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 586 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 5 Arrest and risk of execution of Tundu Lissu, Chair of Chadema, the main opposition party in TanzaniaAmendment154 for, 389 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 497 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after recital A European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 461 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 607 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 48 White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment188 for, 473 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 605 voters
17 Jun 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 36 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeAmendment185 for, 458 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 594 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190418
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 139, after Recital 27 — Generalised scheme of tariff preferences”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 190418, reference 2021/0297(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190418 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-190418,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 139, after Recital 27 — Generalised scheme of tariff preferences}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190418}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190418},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 190418, reference 2021/0297(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}