Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendments 125 + 129 (voted as one), after Article 29 (corresponds to Article 34 in am 120)

Generalised scheme of tariff preferences

Vote
Amendments 125 + 129 (voted as one), after Article 29 (corresponds to Article 34 in am 120)
Result
251 for · 334 against · 48 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 13:57
More facts (6)
Position
vote 16 of 35 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR, Members
Official label
A9-0147/2022 – Bernd Lange – After Article 29 (corresponds to Article 34 in am 120) – Am 125= 129=
Vote id
190410
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 251 for, 334 against, 48 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 40 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 34Abst. 9No vote 3 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.69
GreensFor 6Against 40Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
S&DFor 31Against 79Abst. 0No vote 25 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.58
RenewFor 1Against 70Abst. 0No vote 6 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 60Against 95Abst. 5No vote 25 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.39
ECRFor 49Against 4Abst. 19No vote 9 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.52
PatriotsFor 64Against 6Abst. 6No vote 9 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.76
ESNFor 27Against 0Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 13Against 6Abst. 9No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0140
Denmark030
Spain200
Finland020
France030
Croatia010
Italy400
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Sweden020
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 633 members

No vote recorded, 86

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 86 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Jan 2025Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 7 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Amendment210 for, 133 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.78 331 voters
13 Feb 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 9 Repression by the Ortega-Murillo regime in Nicaragua, targeting human rights defenders, political opponents and religious communities in particularAmendment194 for, 225 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.71 383 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 34 to paragraph 18 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAmendment198 for, 354 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.68 516 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Dec 2025Amendment 5 to paragraph 46 Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gearAmendment227 for, 346 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.68 525 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 40 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment230 for, 380 against, 25 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.66 597 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 40, adding text after paragraph 4 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment250 for, 363 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 40 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.66 590 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 58 2023 and 2024 reports on AlbaniaAmendment239 for, 290 against, 151 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.66 595 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 15 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote210 for, 417 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 33 %r · shared0.66 602 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 64, adding text after paragraph 52 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Amendment209 for, 287 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 41 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.66 448 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 5, adding text after recital D Mass kidnapping of children in Nigeria, including from St Mary’s Catholic School in PapiriAmendment210 for, 338 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.66 516 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendments 125 + 129 (voted as one), after Article 29 (corresponds to Article 34 in am 120) — Generalised scheme of tariff preferences”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 190410, reference 2021/0297(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190410 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-190410,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendments 125 + 129 (voted as one), after Article 29 (corresponds to Article 34 in am 120) — Generalised scheme of tariff preferences}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190410}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190410},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 190410, reference 2021/0297(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}