Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 130, after Article 29 (corresponds to Article 34 in am 120)

Generalised scheme of tariff preferences

Vote
Amendment 130, after Article 29 (corresponds to Article 34 in am 120)
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 28 Apr 2026
Result
188 for · 437 against · 21 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 13:57
More facts (6)
Position
vote 14 of 35 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Members
Official label
A9-0147/2022 – Bernd Lange – After Article 29 (corresponds to Article 34 in am 120) – Am 130
Text
Report A-9-2022-0147
Dossier
2021/0297(COD)
Vote id
190408
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 188 for, 437 against, 21 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 8Against 33Abst. 2No vote 3 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.65
GreensFor 0Against 45Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 124Abst. 0No vote 11 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 70Abst. 1No vote 6 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 7Against 155Abst. 1No vote 22 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 61Against 5Abst. 5No vote 10 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
PatriotsFor 71Against 0Abst. 6No vote 8 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
ESNFor 27Against 0Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 14Against 5Abst. 6No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0140
Denmark030
Spain020
Finland020
France030
Croatia010
Italy030
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Sweden020
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 646 members

No vote recorded, 73

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 73 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 253 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment196 for, 441 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.92 625 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 26 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment189 for, 436 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 634 voters
17 Jul 2024Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther119 for, 337 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.91 416 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Sept 2025Amendment 7 to paragraph 36 Implementation and streamlining of EU internal market rules to strengthen the single marketAmendment201 for, 399 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 546 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 65 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment194 for, 417 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.91 600 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 13 Implementation and streamlining of EU internal market rules to strengthen the single marketAmendment208 for, 401 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 552 voters
17 Jun 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 49 2025 Commission report on AlbaniaAmendment195 for, 429 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 588 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 57 to paragraph 146 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment177 for, 435 against, 37 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 624 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 11 to paragraph 26 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment170 for, 426 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 558 voters
21 Jan 2026Amendment 16 to paragraph 78 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025Amendment184 for, 451 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 599 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190408
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 130, after Article 29 (corresponds to Article 34 in am 120) — Generalised scheme of tariff preferences”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 190408, reference 2021/0297(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190408 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-190408,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 130, after Article 29 (corresponds to Article 34 in am 120) — Generalised scheme of tariff preferences}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190408}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190408},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 190408, reference 2021/0297(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}