Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 124 to article 19, After paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120)

Generalised scheme of tariff preferences

Vote
Amendment 124 to article 19, After paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120)
Result
95 for · 551 against · 9 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 13:56
More facts (6)
Position
vote 12 of 35 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A9-0147/2022 – Bernd Lange – Article 19, After § 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) – Am 124
Vote id
190406
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 95 for, 551 against, 9 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 15 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 44Against 1Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 1Against 121Abst. 1No vote 12 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 2Against 68Abst. 0No vote 7 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 0Against 168Abst. 0No vote 17 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 0Against 74Abst. 0No vote 7 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 77Abst. 0No vote 8 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 27Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 5Against 15Abst. 8No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium030
Czechia070
Denmark010
Spain050
France0280
Greece010
Hungary080
Italy060
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Poland030
Portugal020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 655 members

No vote recorded, 64

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 64 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 56 to recital D The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.96 535 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.95 551 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 4 to Annex, point a Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Amendment81 for, 468 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.94 523 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2026Proposal to reject the text Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Rejection81 for, 473 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 14 %r · shared0.94 525 voters
18 Dec 2024Amendment 1 to recital A Setting up a Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield, and defining its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of officeAmendment106 for, 533 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 586 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 540 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 5 to Annex, point b Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Amendment81 for, 466 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.93 521 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 71 to paragraph 14 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 543 voters
29 Apr 2026Proposal to reject the text Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsRejection99 for, 539 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 15 %r · shared0.93 623 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 201 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment92 for, 545 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 590 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 124 to article 19, After paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) — Generalised scheme of tariff preferences”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 190406, reference 2021/0297(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190406 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-190406,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 124 to article 19, After paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) — Generalised scheme of tariff preferences}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190406}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190406},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 190406, reference 2021/0297(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}