Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Proposal to reject the text

Generalised scheme of tariff preferences

Vote
Proposal to reject the text
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 28 Apr 2026
Result
39 for · 600 against · 16 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 13:54
More facts (5)
Position
vote 1 of 35 on the decision
Official label
A9-0147/2022 – Bernd Lange – Proposal for rejection – Am 131
Text
Report A-9-2022-0147
Dossier
2021/0297(COD)
Vote id
190403
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 39 for, 600 against, 16 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 6 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 42Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 45Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 124Abst. 0No vote 11 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 71Abst. 0No vote 6 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 3Against 164Abst. 0No vote 18 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 2Against 74Abst. 0No vote 5 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 6Against 56Abst. 15No vote 8 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.59
ESNFor 26Against 1Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 2Against 23Abst. 1No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium120
Bulgaria140
Cyprus020
Czechia050
Germany0290
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain0200
Finland030
France050
Greece060
Croatia050
Hungary040
Ireland040
Italy080
Lithuania030
Luxembourg020
Latvia020
Malta020
Netherlands040
Poland0210
Portugal160
Romania080
Sweden050
Slovenia040
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 655 members

No vote recorded, 64

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 64 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190403
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Proposal to reject the text — Generalised scheme of tariff preferences”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 190403, reference 2021/0297(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190403 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-190403,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Proposal to reject the text — Generalised scheme of tariff preferences}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190403}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/190403},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 190403, reference 2021/0297(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}