Skip to content

Vote · Final vote

Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group — Limiting EU legislation

Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group – Limiting EU legislation

Vote
Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group — Limiting EU legislation
Result
127 for · 338 against · 5 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
27 April 2026, 18:15
More facts (4)
Effect
Rejected — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group – Limiting EU legislation
Vote id
191135
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 127 for, 338 against, 5 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 27 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Rejected.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 35Abst. 0No vote 11 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 42Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 84Abst. 0No vote 51 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 54Abst. 0No vote 23 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 1Against 116Abst. 1No vote 67 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 35Against 1Abst. 2No vote 43 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
PatriotsFor 64Against 0Abst. 0No vote 21 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 14Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 13Against 6Abst. 2No vote 9 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium020
Bulgaria010
Germany0110
Denmark020
Spain0130
Finland020
France060
Greece030
Croatia020
Hungary010
Ireland010
Italy0130
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands030
Poland030
Portugal050
Romania040
Sweden050

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 470 members

No vote recorded, 249

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 249 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.99 445 voters
25 Nov 2025Amendment 11 to paragraph 4 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment191 for, 443 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.99 430 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment196 for, 422 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.98 432 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Terrorist attack in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – Terrorist attack in ModenaOther134 for, 309 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.98 373 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 37 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment176 for, 431 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 399 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 22 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment195 for, 420 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.98 433 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 12 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment193 for, 428 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 435 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment192 for, 465 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.98 439 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after recital A European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 461 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 447 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 119, adding text after paragraph 50 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment198 for, 463 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 438 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group — Limiting EU legislation — Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group – Limiting EU legislation”. Vote, 27 April 2026. votingId 191135. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-27/191135 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 27 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-27-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 27 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-27-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-27, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-27/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-27-191135,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group — Limiting EU legislation — Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group – Limiting EU legislation}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-27},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-27/191135}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-27/191135},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191135. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-27-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-27-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-27 (CC BY 4.0)}
}