Skip to content

Vote · Final vote

Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — ‘One Europe, one market’

Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – ‘One Europe, one market’

Vote
Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — ‘One Europe, one market’
Result
132 for · 327 against · 3 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
27 April 2026, 18:12
More facts (4)
Effect
Rejected — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – ‘One Europe, one market’
Vote id
191134
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 132 for, 327 against, 3 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Rejected.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 33Abst. 1No vote 12 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 0Against 42Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 82Abst. 0No vote 53 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 54Abst. 0No vote 23 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 4Against 111Abst. 1No vote 69 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 35Against 1Abst. 0No vote 45 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 63Against 0Abst. 0No vote 22 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 14Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 16Against 4Abst. 1No vote 9 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium010
Cyprus010
Germany030
Denmark001
Spain030
Finland020
France080
Greece030
Italy070
Netherlands010
Portugal020
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 462 members

No vote recorded, 257

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 257 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 437 voters
10 Mar 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR GroupOther110 for, 309 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 26 %r · shared0.97 321 voters
20 Jan 2025Ordre du jour de mercredi — Demande du groupe PfE Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther108 for, 313 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.96 323 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment201 for, 438 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 431 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 48 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment195 for, 455 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.96 425 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 13, adding text after recital 2 Amending Directives (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards the dates from which Member States are to apply certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment179 for, 405 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 388 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 43, adding text after paragraph 56 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment201 for, 453 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %r · shared0.96 426 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 76 to paragraph 73, after point iii Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment190 for, 449 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 412 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after recital A European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 461 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 439 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 5 to recital N EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution)Amendment191 for, 448 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 433 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — ‘One Europe, one market’ — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – ‘One Europe, one market’”. Vote, 27 April 2026. votingId 191134. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-27/191134 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 27 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-27-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 27 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-27-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-27, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-27/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-27-191134,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — ‘One Europe, one market’ — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – ‘One Europe, one market’}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-27},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-27/191134}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-27/191134},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191134. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-27-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-27-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-27 (CC BY 4.0)}
}