Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 106 to article 1

Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)

Vote
Amendment 106 to article 1
Result
67 for · 540 against · 33 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
26 March 2026, 11:35
More facts (6)
Position
vote 45 of 55 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0073/2026 – Arba Kokalari, Michael McNamara – Article 1 – § 1 – point 30 – point b; Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 – Article 111 – § 4 – Am 106D
Vote id
189651
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 67 for, 540 against, 33 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 10 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 29Against 0Abst. 8No vote 9 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.68
GreensFor 13Against 35Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.59
S&DFor 7Against 102Abst. 0No vote 26 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
RenewFor 11Against 58Abst. 0No vote 8 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
EPPFor 0Against 167Abst. 0No vote 17 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 1Against 70Abst. 3No vote 7 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 0Against 71Abst. 12No vote 2 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.78
ESNFor 2Against 25Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
No groupFor 4Against 12Abst. 10No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria010
Belgium050
Bulgaria030
Germany080
Denmark040
Estonia020
Spain010
Finland020
France1110
Ireland050
Italy010
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands070
Poland010
Portugal020
Romania030
Sweden020
Slovenia020
Slovakia040

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 640 members

No vote recorded, 78

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 78 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 Jan 2026Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 29 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment79 for, 561 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 590 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 26, adding text after paragraph 16 Clean Industrial DealAmendment70 for, 476 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 13 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 492 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 5 Case of Boualem Sansal in AlgeriaAmendment62 for, 540 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 10 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.72 540 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Jun 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 5 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment79 for, 557 against, 26 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.71 594 voters
23 Oct 2024Amendment 7, adding text before paragraph 1 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsAmendment78 for, 554 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.70 569 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 174 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment65 for, 568 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 10 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.70 581 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 16 Clean Industrial DealAmendment74 for, 478 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 13 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.70 500 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 12 Clean Industrial DealAmendment62 for, 497 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.70 505 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 294 to Article 13, paragraph 3, après le point c Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment63 for, 504 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.69 514 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 278 to recital 37 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment58 for, 515 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 10 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.66 516 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
28 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 106 to article 1 — Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)”. Vote, 26 March 2026. votingId 189651, reference 2025/0359(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-26/189651 (retrieved 28 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 26 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 26 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-26, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-26/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-26-189651,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 106 to article 1 — Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-26},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-26/189651}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-26/189651},
  urldate = {2026-09-28},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 189651, reference 2025/0359(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-26 (CC BY 4.0)}
}