Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 108 to article 1

Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)

Vote
Amendment 108 to article 1
Result
195 for · 433 against · 9 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
26 March 2026, 11:35
More facts (6)
Position
vote 44 of 55 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
A10-0073/2026 – Arba Kokalari, Michael McNamara – Article 1 – § 1 – point 30 – point a; Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 – Article 111 – § 2 – after sub§ 2 – Am 108
Vote id
189650
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 195 for, 433 against, 9 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 31 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 29Abst. 8No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.68
GreensFor 0Against 48Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 108Abst. 0No vote 27 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 8 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 1Against 165Abst. 0No vote 18 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 73Against 0Abst. 1No vote 7 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 83Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 27Against 0Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 11Against 14Abst. 0No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria300
Czechia100
Germany1500
France100
Hungary100
Italy100
Lithuania100
Poland200
Slovakia200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 637 members

No vote recorded, 81

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 81 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2026Amendment 7 to recital AY The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAmendment175 for, 378 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 502 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 45 to paragraph 61 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment178 for, 463 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.97 577 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 3 to recital Q Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemAmendment167 for, 405 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Renew, Membersr · shared0.97 509 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment192 for, 456 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 586 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 7 Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí NavarroAmendment153 for, 424 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 519 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 17 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment188 for, 457 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.96 581 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 445 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 583 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 30 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment186 for, 443 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.96 579 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 5 to recital N EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution)Amendment191 for, 448 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 582 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 6 to recital E EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment185 for, 477 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 585 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 108 to article 1 — Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)”. Vote, 26 March 2026. votingId 189650, reference 2025/0359(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-26/189650 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 26 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 26 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-26, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-26/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-26-189650,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 108 to article 1 — Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-26},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-26/189650}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-26/189650},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 189650, reference 2025/0359(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-26 (CC BY 4.0)}
}