Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 105 to article 1

Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)

Vote
Amendment 105 to article 1
Result
76 for · 542 against · 15 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
26 March 2026, 11:35
More facts (6)
Position
vote 43 of 55 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0073/2026 – Arba Kokalari, Michael McNamara – Article 1 – § 1 – point 30 – point a; Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 – Article 111 – § 2 – Am 105
Vote id
189649
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 76 for, 542 against, 15 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 12 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 29Against 0Abst. 8No vote 9 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.68
GreensFor 12Against 35Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.62
S&DFor 7Against 101Abst. 0No vote 27 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
RenewFor 11Against 57Abst. 0No vote 9 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
EPPFor 0Against 163Abst. 0No vote 21 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 0Against 74Abst. 0No vote 7 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 3Against 74Abst. 6No vote 2 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
ESNFor 2Against 25Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
No groupFor 12Against 13Abst. 1No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia010
Germany0150
France010
Hungary010
Italy010
Lithuania010
Poland200
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 633 members

No vote recorded, 85

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 85 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Jun 2025Amendment 26, adding text after paragraph 16 Clean Industrial DealAmendment70 for, 476 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 13 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 487 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 29 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment79 for, 561 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 583 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 12 Clean Industrial DealAmendment62 for, 497 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.74 500 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 294 to Article 13, paragraph 3, après le point c Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment63 for, 504 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 507 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 16 Clean Industrial DealAmendment74 for, 478 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 13 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 495 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 5 Case of Boualem Sansal in AlgeriaAmendment62 for, 540 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 10 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.72 533 voters
23 Oct 2024Amendment 7, adding text before paragraph 1 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsAmendment78 for, 554 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.72 562 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 5 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment79 for, 557 against, 26 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.71 588 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 121 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment80 for, 529 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.71 578 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 278 to recital 37 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment58 for, 515 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 10 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.70 509 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 105 to article 1 — Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)”. Vote, 26 March 2026. votingId 189649, reference 2025/0359(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-26/189649 (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 26 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 26 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-26, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-26/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-26-189649,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 105 to article 1 — Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-26},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-26/189649}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-26/189649},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 189649, reference 2025/0359(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-26 (CC BY 4.0)}
}