Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Proposal to vote on amendments

Combating corruption

Vote
Proposal to vote on amendments
Result
179 for · 446 against · 16 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
26 March 2026, 11:11
More facts (5)
Position
vote 1 of 17 on the decision
Official label
A9-0048/2024 – Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle – Proposal to vote on amendments
Vote id
189599
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 179 for, 446 against, 16 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 28 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 37Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 1Against 47Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 0Against 109Abst. 0No vote 26 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 8 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 1Against 166Abst. 1No vote 16 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 75Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 70Against 7Abst. 6No vote 2 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.77
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 4No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.78
No groupFor 9Against 11Abst. 5No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Cyprus010
Germany040
Denmark010
Spain020
Finland030
France080
Greece030
Ireland010
Italy090
Netherlands010
Portugal010
Sweden010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 641 members

No vote recorded, 77

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 77 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Proposal to vote on amendments Harmonising certain aspects of insolvency lawProcedural164 for, 447 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.95 567 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 11 to paragraph 26 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment170 for, 426 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 552 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 13 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment154 for, 474 against, 41 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 595 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Amendment 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAmendment180 for, 455 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriots, S&D, Renewr · shared0.94 586 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 44 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European UnionAmendment187 for, 450 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 586 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 7 Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí NavarroAmendment153 for, 424 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 525 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 17 Clean Industrial DealAmendment180 for, 381 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.93 498 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 259, adding text after recital 26 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment178 for, 385 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 505 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 37 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment176 for, 431 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 555 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 32 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment178 for, 435 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 557 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

  • Decision Combating corruption New EU law · report by Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle 26 Mar 2026 Passed

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Proposal to vote on amendments — Combating corruption”. Vote, 26 March 2026. votingId 189599, reference 2023/0135(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-26/189599 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 26 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 26 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-26, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-26/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-26-189599,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Proposal to vote on amendments — Combating corruption}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-26},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-26/189599}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-26/189599},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 189599, reference 2023/0135(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-26 (CC BY 4.0)}
}