Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Proposal to reject the text

Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America

Vote
Proposal to reject the text
Decision
No. 4 of the sitting of 26 Mar 2026
Result
160 for · 462 against · 16 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
26 March 2026, 11:21
More facts (5)
Position
vote 2 of 19 on the decision
Official label
A10-0069/2026 – Bernd Lange – Proposal for rejection – Am 47
Text
Report A-10-2026-0069
Dossier
2025/0261(COD)
Vote id
189581
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 160 for, 462 against, 16 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 25 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 21Against 25Abst. 1No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.30
S&DFor 8Against 100Abst. 3No vote 24 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
RenewFor 14Against 53Abst. 0No vote 10 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.69
EPPFor 0Against 169Abst. 0No vote 15 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 1Against 74Abst. 0No vote 6 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 40Against 31Abst. 12No vote 2 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.22
ESNFor 20Against 6Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.65
No groupFor 21Against 4Abst. 0No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria006
Belgium300
Czechia080
Denmark100
Spain006
France3000
Greece010
Hungary0100
Italy060
Latvia100
Netherlands060
Poland300
Portugal200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 638 members

No vote recorded, 80

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 80 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Mar 2026Proposal to reject the text Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goodsRejection159 for, 458 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.94 635 voters
26 Mar 2026Motion for adjournment of vote Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goodsOther174 for, 450 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.77 633 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C Continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina FasoAmendment94 for, 397 against, 69 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 505 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 12 Multilateral negotiations in view of the WTO’s 14th Ministerial Conference in Yaoundé, 26 to 29 March 2026Amendment133 for, 385 against, 25 abstained Rejected For 24 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.74 502 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 13 to paragraph 2 EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for UkraineAmendment85 for, 443 against, 46 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.74 522 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 1 Brutal repression against protesters in IranAmendment128 for, 423 against, 68 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 568 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 50 to paragraph 50 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Amendment92 for, 536 against, 44 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 596 voters
18 Dec 2024Amendment 1 to paragraph 2 Amendment of Annex VI – Powers and responsibilities of the standing committeesAmendment131 for, 492 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 565 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 1, adding text after recital T White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment78 for, 515 against, 87 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.72 603 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 91, adding text after paragraph 40 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment95 for, 495 against, 60 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.72 583 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-26/189581
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Proposal to reject the text — Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America”. Vote, 26 March 2026. votingId 189581, reference 2025/0261(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-26/189581 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 26 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 26 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-26, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-26/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-26-189581,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Proposal to reject the text — Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-26},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-26/189581}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-26/189581},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 189581, reference 2025/0261(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-26 (CC BY 4.0)}
}