Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 5 to annex, point b

Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029

Vote
Amendment 5 to annex, point b
Result
81 for · 466 against · 10 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 March 2026, 12:06
More facts (4)
Position
vote 4 of 7 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
C10-0351/2025 – Annex, point b – Am 5
Vote id
189133
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 81 for, 466 against, 10 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 15 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 32Against 0Abst. 1No vote 13 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 109Abst. 0No vote 26 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 60Abst. 0No vote 16 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 1Against 142Abst. 0No vote 41 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 0Against 58Abst. 0No vote 23 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 61Abst. 0No vote 23 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 5 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 3Against 13Abst. 9No vote 6 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Bulgaria030
Germany060
Denmark040
Estonia010
Spain010
Finland030
France090
Ireland060
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands070
Poland010
Portugal020
Romania020
Sweden020
Slovenia020
Slovakia030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 557 members

No vote recorded, 161

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 161 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 201 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment92 for, 545 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 511 voters
29 Apr 2026Proposal to reject the text Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsRejection99 for, 539 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 15 %r · shared0.93 514 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 176 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment94 for, 545 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 511 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Amendment 124 to Article 19, After paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) Generalised scheme of tariff preferencesAmendment95 for, 551 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 521 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 50 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment94 for, 559 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 516 voters
31 Mar 2025Tuesday's agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE Group Final vote Tuesday's agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE GroupOther82 for, 357 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 18 %r · shared0.93 351 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 56 to recital D The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 470 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 478 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 473 voters
9 Oct 2025Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 9 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024Amendment65 for, 529 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.92 489 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 5 to annex, point b — Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029”. Vote, 12 March 2026. votingId 189133. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-12/189133 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-12-189133,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 5 to annex, point b — Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-12/189133}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-12/189133},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 189133. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}