Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 4 to annex, point a

Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029

Vote
Amendment 4 to annex, point a
Result
81 for · 468 against · 9 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 March 2026, 12:06
More facts (4)
Position
vote 3 of 7 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
C10-0351/2025 – Annex, point a – Am 4
Vote id
189132
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 81 for, 468 against, 9 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 15 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 32Against 0Abst. 1No vote 13 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 109Abst. 0No vote 26 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 60Abst. 0No vote 16 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 1Against 141Abst. 0No vote 42 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 0Against 61Abst. 0No vote 20 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 60Abst. 0No vote 24 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 5 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 3Against 14Abst. 8No vote 6 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria040
Belgium030
Bulgaria020
Cyprus010
Germany0130
Denmark030
Estonia020
Spain0140
Finland020
France080
Greece020
Croatia040
Italy0180
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Malta030
Netherlands040
Poland030
Portugal080
Romania070
Sweden040

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 558 members

No vote recorded, 160

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 160 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Amendment 124 to Article 19, After paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) Generalised scheme of tariff preferencesAmendment95 for, 551 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 523 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 50 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment94 for, 559 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 518 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 176 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment94 for, 545 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 511 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 56 to recital D The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 472 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 201 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment92 for, 545 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 511 voters
29 Apr 2026Proposal to reject the text Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsRejection99 for, 539 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 15 %r · shared0.94 516 voters
31 Mar 2025Tuesday's agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE Group Final vote Tuesday's agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE GroupOther82 for, 357 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 18 %r · shared0.94 351 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 479 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 475 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 1 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment99 for, 547 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 525 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 4 to annex, point a — Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029”. Vote, 12 March 2026. votingId 189132. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-12/189132 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-12-189132,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 4 to annex, point a — Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-12/189132}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-12/189132},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 189132. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}