Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 17, after paragraph 28

European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026

Vote
Amendment 17, after paragraph 28
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 11 Mar 2026
Result
183 for · 404 against · 37 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
11 March 2026, 13:00
More facts (6)
Position
vote 19 of 27 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0036/2026 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – After § 28 – Am 17
Text
Report A-10-2026-0036
Dossier
2025/2214(INI)
Vote id
188604
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 183 for, 404 against, 37 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 4Against 25Abst. 9No vote 8 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.49
GreensFor 0Against 47Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 119Abst. 1No vote 15 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 1Against 67Abst. 0No vote 8 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 12Against 130Abst. 20No vote 22 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.70
ECRFor 67Against 6Abst. 1No vote 7 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
PatriotsFor 63Against 0Abst. 0No vote 21 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 28Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 11Against 10Abst. 6No vote 4 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria600
Belgium300
Czechia700
Denmark100
Spain400
France1800
Greece100
Hungary600
Italy700
Latvia100
Netherlands500
Poland200
Portugal200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 624 members

No vote recorded, 94

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 94 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 422 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 575 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 4 Case of Victoire Ingabire in RwandaAmendment175 for, 393 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 515 voters
16 Sept 2024Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther102 for, 279 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 26 %r · shared0.90 330 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendments 408 + 416 (voted as one) to Annex VII, Part C, point 6 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment204 for, 438 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 563 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 3, adding text after recital M Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targetsAmendment204 for, 455 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 582 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 33, adding text after paragraph 2 Clean Industrial DealAmendment178 for, 383 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.89 497 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendment 6, adding text after recital 17 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAmendment197 for, 458 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriots, Greensr · shared0.89 584 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 19 — part 2 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Amendment179 for, 375 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriots, ESNr · shared0.89 494 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 10, adding text after recital F Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economiesAmendment207 for, 425 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 575 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital B Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment195 for, 403 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 527 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188604
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 17, after paragraph 28 — European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026”. Vote, 11 March 2026. votingId 188604, reference 2025/2214(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188604 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-11-188604,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 17, after paragraph 28 — European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188604}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188604},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188604, reference 2025/2214(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}