Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 16 to paragraph 28

European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026

Vote
Amendment 16 to paragraph 28
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 11 Mar 2026
Result
189 for · 415 against · 16 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
11 March 2026, 13:00
More facts (6)
Position
vote 16 of 27 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0036/2026 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – § 28 – Am 16
Text
Report A-10-2026-0036
Dossier
2025/2214(INI)
Vote id
188600
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 189 for, 415 against, 16 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 30 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 29Abst. 10No vote 6 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.59
GreensFor 0Against 47Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 110Abst. 2No vote 23 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 0Against 68Abst. 0No vote 8 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 6Against 157Abst. 1No vote 20 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 75Against 2Abst. 0No vote 4 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 63Against 0Abst. 0No vote 21 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 28Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 19Against 2Abst. 3No vote 7 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium040
Bulgaria020
Cyprus010
Germany0140
Denmark030
Estonia020
Spain0140
Finland020
France002
Greece030
Croatia040
Hungary020
Italy0180
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Malta030
Netherlands040
Poland030
Portugal080
Romania090
Sweden040
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 620 members

No vote recorded, 98

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 98 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 422 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 573 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 83 to recital 1 Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation FundAmendment195 for, 465 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 581 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 1, adding text after citation 13 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment183 for, 421 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 573 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Sept 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 4 Case of Victoire Ingabire in RwandaAmendment175 for, 393 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 517 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 32 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 415 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 568 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 7 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment200 for, 433 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 569 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 2, adding text after recital D Case of Victoire Ingabire in RwandaAmendment166 for, 398 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 519 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment186 for, 423 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 578 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 12 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment181 for, 417 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 567 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 89 to paragraph 252, after point xiii Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment213 for, 443 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.96 564 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188600
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 16 to paragraph 28 — European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026”. Vote, 11 March 2026. votingId 188600, reference 2025/2214(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188600 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-11-188600,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 16 to paragraph 28 — European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188600}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188600},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188600, reference 2025/2214(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}