Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 11, after paragraph 22

European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026

Vote
Amendment 11, after paragraph 22
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 11 Mar 2026
Result
79 for · 519 against · 36 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
11 March 2026, 12:59
More facts (6)
Position
vote 12 of 27 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0036/2026 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – After § 22 – Am 11
Text
Report A-10-2026-0036
Dossier
2025/2214(INI)
Vote id
188595
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 79 for, 519 against, 36 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 12 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 4Against 40Abst. 3No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.78
S&DFor 1Against 116Abst. 1No vote 17 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 7 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 1Against 164Abst. 0No vote 19 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 0Against 75Abst. 2No vote 4 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 0Against 45Abst. 18No vote 21 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.57
ESNFor 16Against 3Abst. 6No vote 3 of 28Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.46
No groupFor 14Against 7Abst. 6No vote 4 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium011
Czechia010
Germany0140
Denmark030
Spain012
Finland020
France300
Croatia010
Italy030
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Romania100
Sweden030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 634 members

No vote recorded, 84

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 84 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 12 Brutal repression against protesters in IranAmendment72 for, 461 against, 91 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 562 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 91, adding text after paragraph 40 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment95 for, 495 against, 60 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 583 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 2 Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in IranAmendment72 for, 459 against, 37 abstained Rejected For 13 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 513 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C Continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina FasoAmendment94 for, 397 against, 69 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 497 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 1 to recital G Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineAmendment62 for, 522 against, 27 abstained Rejected For 10 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 546 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 1, adding text after recital T White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment78 for, 515 against, 87 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 595 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 5 Case of Boualem Sansal in AlgeriaAmendment62 for, 540 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 10 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 547 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 90, adding text after paragraph 39 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment98 for, 528 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 586 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 5 Escalating repression of the Baha’is in IranAmendment79 for, 493 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 527 voters
16 Sept 2026Proposal to reject the text Acceleration of permit-granting for defence readiness projects (Omnibus V)Rejection95 for, 546 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 14 %r · shared0.78 585 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188595
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 11, after paragraph 22 — European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026”. Vote, 11 March 2026. votingId 188595, reference 2025/2214(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188595 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-11-188595,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 11, after paragraph 22 — European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188595}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188595},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188595, reference 2025/2214(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}