Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 9, after paragraph 22

European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026

Vote
Amendment 9, after paragraph 22
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 11 Mar 2026
Result
97 for · 367 against · 161 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
11 March 2026, 12:59
More facts (6)
Position
vote 10 of 27 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0036/2026 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – After § 22 – Am 9
Text
Report A-10-2026-0036
Dossier
2025/2214(INI)
Vote id
188594
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 97 for, 367 against, 161 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 16 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 12Against 0Abst. 34No vote 7 of 53Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.61
S&DFor 27Against 2Abst. 88No vote 18 of 135Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.63
RenewFor 1Against 67Abst. 0No vote 8 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 1Against 163Abst. 0No vote 20 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 1Against 72Abst. 2No vote 6 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 0Against 36Abst. 25No vote 23 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.39
ESNFor 2Against 18Abst. 5No vote 3 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.58
No groupFor 11Against 9Abst. 7No vote 4 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium003
Czechia060
Denmark010
Spain040
France0017
Greece010
Hungary060
Italy070
Latvia010
Netherlands005
Poland020
Portugal020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 625 members

No vote recorded, 93

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 93 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 4 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025Amendment139 for, 392 against, 139 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 577 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment209 for, 359 against, 43 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 534 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital A Presidential elections in Honduras, the non-recognition of the outcome by the incumbent administration and the attacks on opposition members of the National AssemblyAmendment215 for, 362 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 548 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 21 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment160 for, 300 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 418 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 7 to paragraph 36 Public procurementAmendment261 for, 365 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 40 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 561 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 46 Competition policy – annual report 2025Amendment139 for, 369 against, 144 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 571 voters
21 Jan 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 4 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025Amendment198 for, 383 against, 62 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 570 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment250 for, 391 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 563 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 4 to paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment241 for, 345 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.82 538 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment202 for, 330 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 495 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188594
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 9, after paragraph 22 — European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026”. Vote, 11 March 2026. votingId 188594, reference 2025/2214(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188594 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-11-188594,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 9, after paragraph 22 — European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188594}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188594},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188594, reference 2025/2214(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}