Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 5, after paragraph 11

European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026

Vote
Amendment 5, after paragraph 11
Result
107 for · 458 against · 65 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
11 March 2026, 12:57
More facts (6)
Position
vote 3 of 27 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0036/2026 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – After § 11 – Am 5
Vote id
188589
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 107 for, 458 against, 65 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 17 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 2No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
GreensFor 12Against 0Abst. 35No vote 6 of 53Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.62
S&DFor 36Against 75Abst. 7No vote 17 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.45
RenewFor 5Against 63Abst. 1No vote 7 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
EPPFor 0Against 160Abst. 5No vote 19 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 1Against 70Abst. 4No vote 6 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
PatriotsFor 0Against 63Abst. 0No vote 21 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 1Against 22Abst. 1No vote 4 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 12Against 5Abst. 10No vote 4 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia100
Germany0120
Hungary001
Italy010
Lithuania010
Poland030
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 630 members

No vote recorded, 88

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 88 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 Jan 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 14 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment81 for, 518 against, 56 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 583 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 40, adding text after paragraph 121 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment98 for, 508 against, 48 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 583 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 45 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment118 for, 518 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 581 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 81, adding text after paragraph 17 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment129 for, 499 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.76 566 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 14 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment78 for, 528 against, 58 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.76 589 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 37 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment103 for, 470 against, 83 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.76 584 voters
21 May 2025Request by The Left Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupOther102 for, 378 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 21 %r · shared0.75 427 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 37 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment119 for, 484 against, 26 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 604 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 37 to paragraph 54 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment123 for, 536 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 589 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 32 to paragraph 48 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment131 for, 520 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 585 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 5, after paragraph 11 — European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026”. Vote, 11 March 2026. votingId 188589, reference 2025/2214(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188589 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-11-188589,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 5, after paragraph 11 — European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188589}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188589},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188589, reference 2025/2214(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}