Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 18, after recital 4

Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application

Vote
Amendment 18, after recital 4
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 11 Mar 2026
Result
270 for · 325 against · 9 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
11 March 2026, 12:48
More facts (6)
Position
vote 27 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
A10-0040/2026 – Birgit Sippel – After recital 4 – Am 18
Text
Report A-10-2026-0040
Dossier
2025/0429(COD)
Vote id
188584
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 270 for, 325 against, 9 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 45 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 29Abst. 2No vote 14 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
GreensFor 39Against 1Abst. 0No vote 13 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
S&DFor 4Against 110Abst. 0No vote 21 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
RenewFor 30Against 35Abst. 1No vote 10 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.30
EPPFor 16Against 147Abst. 2No vote 19 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
ECRFor 76Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 62Against 0Abst. 0No vote 22 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 28Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 18Against 3Abst. 4No vote 6 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria600
Belgium300
Czechia700
Denmark100
Spain400
France1700
Greece100
Hungary600
Italy700
Latvia100
Netherlands500
Poland200
Portugal200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 604 members

No vote recorded, 114

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 114 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 13 to paragraph 22 Discharge 2024: AgenciesAmendment209 for, 433 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.74 555 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 16 to paragraph 48 Discharge 2024: AgenciesAmendment198 for, 417 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.74 538 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 34 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment201 for, 420 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.74 537 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment196 for, 422 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.74 532 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 47, adding text after recital P Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment202 for, 431 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.73 541 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 27 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European External Action ServiceAmendment211 for, 431 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.73 553 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 12 to paragraph 19 Discharge 2024: AgenciesAmendment199 for, 429 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.73 540 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 94 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment202 for, 430 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.73 548 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 237 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment200 for, 440 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.73 558 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 14 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment200 for, 439 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.73 560 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 10 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188584
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 18, after recital 4 — Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application”. Vote, 11 March 2026. votingId 188584, reference 2025/0429(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188584 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-11-188584,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 18, after recital 4 — Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188584}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188584},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188584, reference 2025/0429(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}