Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 2 — part 1, before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021

Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application

Vote
Amendment 2 — part 1, before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021
Result
469 for · 77 against · 70 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
11 March 2026, 12:46
More facts (6)
Position
vote 7 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D, Patriots · split vote: Patriots
Official label
A10-0040/2026 – Birgit Sippel – Before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 – Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – Am 2/1
Vote id
188580
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 469 for, 77 against, 70 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 76 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “the technologies used for the purpose set out in point (a)(i) of this paragraph are in accordance with the state of the art in the industry and are the least privacy-intrusive, including with regard to the principle of data protection by design and by default laid down in Article 25 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and, to the extent that they are used to scan text in communications, they are not able to deduce the substance of the content of the communications but are solely able to detect patterns which point to possible online child sexual abuse,”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 41Abst. 1No vote 3 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 98Against 16Abst. 1No vote 20 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.78
RenewFor 53Against 10Abst. 3No vote 10 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.70
EPPFor 160Against 1Abst. 2No vote 21 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 44Against 0Abst. 30No vote 7 of 81Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.39
PatriotsFor 50Against 6Abst. 6No vote 22 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.71
ESNFor 5Against 0Abst. 19No vote 4 of 28Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.69
No groupFor 12Against 3Abst. 8No vote 8 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1400
Denmark200
Spain300
Finland200
France300
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Romania100
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 616 members

No vote recorded, 102

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 102 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Jul 2025Final vote — text as a whole Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictionsFinal523 for, 75 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.56 527 voters
18 Dec 2025Paragraph 11 — part 1 Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against LithuaniaSplit vote472 for, 61 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by The Left, Greensr · shared0.56 485 voters
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Reduced US military deployment in Europe Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Reduced US military deployment in EuropeOther342 for, 65 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 76 %r · shared0.55 384 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
27 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 250 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSeparate vote505 for, 62 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.55 532 voters
22 Jan 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Drones and new systems of warfare – the EU’s need to adapt to be fit for today’s security challengesFinal483 for, 68 against, 76 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.55 548 voters
27 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 262 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSeparate vote518 for, 67 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.55 535 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 251 — part 3 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSplit vote472 for, 64 against, 70 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.55 534 voters
16 Sept 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for the defence industry (Omnibus V)Final530 for, 125 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.54 568 voters
27 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 260 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSeparate vote506 for, 71 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.53 531 voters
23 Oct 2024Amendment 156 Draft general budget of the European Union for 2025 – all sectionsAmendment519 for, 74 against, 57 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.53 546 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 10 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 2 — part 1, before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021 — Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application”. Vote, 11 March 2026. votingId 188580, reference 2025/0429(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188580 (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-11-188580,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 2 — part 1, before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021 — Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188580}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188580},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188580, reference 2025/0429(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}