Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Proposal to reject the text

Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application

Vote
Proposal to reject the text
Result
172 for · 435 against · 14 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
11 March 2026, 12:45
More facts (5)
Position
vote 1 of 32 on the decision
Official label
A10-0040/2026 – Birgit Sippel – Proposal for rejection
Vote id
186941
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 172 for, 435 against, 14 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 28 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 2Abst. 1No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 4No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
S&DFor 18Against 95Abst. 0No vote 22 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
RenewFor 11Against 57Abst. 0No vote 8 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
EPPFor 1Against 160Abst. 3No vote 20 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 10Against 65Abst. 0No vote 6 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
PatriotsFor 17Against 45Abst. 0No vote 22 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.59
ESNFor 12Against 7Abst. 5No vote 4 of 28Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.25
No groupFor 21Against 4Abst. 1No vote 5 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria120
Czechia100
Germany750
Hungary001
Italy100
Lithuania001
Poland003
Slovakia200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 621 members

No vote recorded, 97

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 97 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
31 Mar 2025Tuesday's agenda — Request by the The Left Group Final vote Tuesday's agenda – Request by the The Left GroupOther110 for, 335 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 24 %r · shared0.79 383 voters
18 Dec 2024Amendment 10 to paragraph 1, point h Setting up a Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union, and defining its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of officeAmendment130 for, 515 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.72 562 voters
25 Mar 2026Thursday's agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE Group — Request for withdrawal from voting time Final vote Thursday's agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE Group – Request for withdrawal from voting timeOther163 for, 344 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 31 %r · shared0.71 461 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Sept 2025Amendments 79 + 81 (voted as one) Amending ERDF, Cohesion Fund and Just Transition Fund as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term reviewAmendment136 for, 504 against, 27 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.70 571 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 37 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment107 for, 538 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.70 576 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 18 Competition policy – annual report 2024Amendment89 for, 411 against, 58 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.69 480 voters
21 May 2025Request by The Left Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupOther102 for, 378 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 21 %r · shared0.68 422 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 1, adding text after recital D The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment112 for, 485 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.68 534 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAmendment128 for, 469 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.68 528 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 2 Case of Boualem Sansal in AlgeriaAmendment109 for, 443 against, 61 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.67 538 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 10 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Proposal to reject the text — Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application”. Vote, 11 March 2026. votingId 186941, reference 2025/0429(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/186941 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-11-186941,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Proposal to reject the text — Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/186941}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/186941},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 186941, reference 2025/0429(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}