Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the whole text

Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission

Vote
Final vote on the whole text
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 11 Mar 2026
Result
446 for · 100 against · 72 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
11 March 2026, 12:43
More facts (6)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 4 of 4 on the decision
Official label
A10-0031/2026 – Sven Simon – Proposal for a decision (as a whole)
Text
Report A-10-2026-0031
Dossier
2025/2243(ACI)
Vote id
186645
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 446 for, 100 against, 72 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 72 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 3No vote 5 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
GreensFor 46Against 1Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 116Against 0Abst. 0No vote 19 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 68Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 163Against 0Abst. 0No vote 21 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 1Against 21Abst. 52No vote 7 of 81Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.55
PatriotsFor 0Against 53Abst. 9No vote 22 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.78
ESNFor 0Against 21Abst. 0No vote 7 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 14Against 4Abst. 8No vote 5 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Cyprus100
Czechia101
Germany404
France100
Greece022
Luxembourg010
Poland010
Romania001
Slovakia600

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 618 members

No vote recorded, 100

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 100 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 101 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote449 for, 141 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.92 561 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 34 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote449 for, 163 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 589 voters
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 1 — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersSplit vote435 for, 127 against, 47 abstained Adopted For 71 %r · shared0.91 525 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 Oct 2025Final vote on the provisional agreement Statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundationsFinal446 for, 162 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.91 553 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentFinal441 for, 131 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.90 568 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 8 — part 2 Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economiesSplit vote455 for, 147 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.90 576 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 18 — part 1 Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economiesSplit vote444 for, 153 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.90 574 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 33 — part 6 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote428 for, 151 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.90 558 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital Q — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote421 for, 150 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.89 533 voters
9 Sept 2025Recital AH — part 2 of 2 Public procurementSplit vote448 for, 186 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.89 555 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/186645
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote on the whole text — Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission”. Vote, 11 March 2026. votingId 186645, reference 2025/2243(ACI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/186645 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-11-186645,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/186645}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/186645},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 186645, reference 2025/2243(ACI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}