Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the whole text

Tackling barriers to the single market for defence

Vote
Final vote on the whole text
Decision
No. 11 of the sitting of 11 Mar 2026
Result
393 for · 169 against · 67 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
11 March 2026, 13:09
More facts (6)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 3 of 3 on the decision
Official label
A10-0017/2026 – Tobias Cremer – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Text
Report A-10-2026-0017
Dossier
2025/2143(INI)
Vote id
186401
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 393 for, 169 against, 67 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 62 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 4Against 36Abst. 2No vote 4 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 1No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 116Against 0Abst. 4No vote 15 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
RenewFor 66Against 1Abst. 2No vote 7 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 156Against 4Abst. 2No vote 22 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 2Against 35Abst. 39No vote 5 of 81Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.27
PatriotsFor 0Against 48Abst. 14No vote 22 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.66
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 3 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 3Against 20Abst. 3No vote 5 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Cyprus001
Czechia011
Germany180
France010
Greece040
Luxembourg010
Poland010
Romania010
Slovakia231

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 629 members

No vote recorded, 89

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 89 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2026Paragraph 9 — part 1 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandSplit vote319 for, 190 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by Patriots, ECRr · shared0.90 484 voters
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 9 — part 3 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureSplit vote356 for, 218 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 539 voters
18 Jun 2026Paragraph 9 — part 2 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandSplit vote357 for, 144 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 487 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIFinal389 for, 191 against, 75 abstained Adopted For 59 %r · shared0.89 587 voters
24 Feb 2026Paragraph 4 — part 2 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineSplit vote372 for, 134 against, 57 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ECR, Patriotsr · shared0.89 514 voters
11 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Final392 for, 219 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.89 621 voters
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 10 — part 2 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureSplit vote369 for, 212 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 60 %r · shared0.89 542 voters
8 Jul 2026Paragraph 27 — part 4 2025 Commission report on UkraineSplit vote417 for, 192 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.89 583 voters
15 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldFinal420 for, 220 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 63 %r · shared0.88 582 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 9 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote413 for, 237 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by ESN, Patriotsr · shared0.88 582 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 3 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/186401
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote on the whole text — Tackling barriers to the single market for defence”. Vote, 11 March 2026. votingId 186401, reference 2025/2143(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/186401 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-11-186401,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — Tackling barriers to the single market for defence}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/186401}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/186401},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 186401, reference 2025/2143(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}