Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 23, after paragraph 14

Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire

Vote
Amendment 23, after paragraph 14
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 12 Feb 2026
Result
92 for · 427 against · 4 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:53
More facts (6)
Position
vote 28 of 52 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
RC-B10-0114/2026 – After § 14 – Am 23
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0136
Dossier
2026/2602(RSP)
Vote id
185321
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 92 for, 427 against, 4 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 18 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 33Against 1Abst. 0No vote 12 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 40Against 0Abst. 1No vote 12 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
S&DFor 9Against 87Abst. 0No vote 40 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
RenewFor 6Against 51Abst. 0No vote 18 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
EPPFor 0Against 124Abst. 0No vote 63 of 187Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 0Against 61Abst. 0No vote 18 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 66Abst. 0No vote 18 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 1No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 4Against 15Abst. 2No vote 11 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium030
Bulgaria020
Czechia030
Germany0190
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain0170
Finland020
France030
Greece010
Croatia030
Ireland040
Italy060
Lithuania020
Luxembourg020
Latvia020
Malta020
Netherlands060
Poland0200
Portugal050
Romania070
Sweden040
Slovenia040
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 523 members

No vote recorded, 196

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 196 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 199 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment92 for, 542 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 475 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 124 to Article 19, After paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) Generalised scheme of tariff preferencesAmendment95 for, 551 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 487 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 176 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment94 for, 545 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 476 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 201 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment92 for, 545 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 476 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 454 voters
13 Nov 2025Proposal to reject the text Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsRejection105 for, 529 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 16 %r · shared0.88 474 voters
31 Mar 2025Tuesday's agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE Group Final vote Tuesday's agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE GroupOther82 for, 357 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 18 %r · shared0.88 329 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 17 to paragraph 16 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024Amendment98 for, 453 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 441 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 56 to recital D The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 444 voters
12 Mar 2026Proposal to reject the text Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Rejection81 for, 473 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 14 %r · shared0.87 439 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/185321
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 23, after paragraph 14 — Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 185321, reference 2026/2602(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/185321 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-185321,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 23, after paragraph 14 — Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/185321}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/185321},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 185321, reference 2026/2602(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}