Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 3 to recital D

Targeted expulsions of foreign journalists and foreign Christians in Türkiye under national security pretexts

Vote
Amendment 3 to recital D
Decision
No. 4 of the sitting of 12 Feb 2026
Result
175 for · 377 against · 16 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:17
More facts (6)
Position
vote 4 of 15 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
RC-B10-0120/2026 – Recital D – Am 3
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0134
Dossier
2026/2613(RSP)
Vote id
185290
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 175 for, 377 against, 16 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 31 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 38Abst. 1No vote 7 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 2Against 108Abst. 0No vote 26 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 2Against 61Abst. 0No vote 12 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 17Against 125Abst. 2No vote 43 of 187Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
ECRFor 62Against 0Abst. 0No vote 17 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 56Against 0Abst. 5No vote 23 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 11Against 2Abst. 8No vote 11 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria010
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0130
Denmark030
Spain040
Finland010
France040
Croatia010
Italy030
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands040
Sweden030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 568 members

No vote recorded, 151

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 151 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Oct 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 1 — part 2 Declaration of principles for a gender-equal societyAmendment206 for, 373 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 481 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 86 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment200 for, 411 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 503 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 9 to paragraph 19 Recruitment of children by organised crimeAmendment169 for, 389 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 465 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 91 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment207 for, 406 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 499 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 103 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment205 for, 419 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.94 508 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 63, adding text after paragraph 40 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment207 for, 418 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.94 515 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 131, adding text after paragraph 18 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment200 for, 422 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.94 513 voters
9 Oct 2025Amendment 3 to recital B Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentAmendment195 for, 394 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 491 voters
23 Oct 2025Amendment 5 to paragraph 16 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment181 for, 380 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 477 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 6 to paragraph 27 Implementation and streamlining of EU internal market rules to strengthen the single marketAmendment197 for, 402 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 495 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 2 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/185290
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 3 to recital D — Targeted expulsions of foreign journalists and foreign Christians in Türkiye under national security pretexts”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 185290, reference 2026/2613(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/185290 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-185290,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 3 to recital D — Targeted expulsions of foreign journalists and foreign Christians in Türkiye under national security pretexts}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/185290}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/185290},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 185290, reference 2026/2613(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}