Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: recital P

Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women

Vote
Separate vote: recital P
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 12 Feb 2026
Result
267 for · 261 against · 21 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:45
More facts (6)
Position
vote 76 of 77 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · separate vote: EPP
Official label
A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – Recital P
Text
Report A-10-2026-0010
Dossier
2025/2240(INI)
Vote id
184873
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 267 for, 261 against, 21 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 49 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 33Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 41Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 106Against 0Abst. 0No vote 30 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 56Against 0Abst. 4No vote 15 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
EPPFor 18Against 112Abst. 1No vote 56 of 187Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.78
ECRFor 0Against 55Abst. 8No vote 16 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
PatriotsFor 0Against 61Abst. 6No vote 17 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 13Against 8Abst. 2No vote 9 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium030
Bulgaria030
Czechia040
Germany1190
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain1160
Finland110
France030
Greece010
Croatia040
Ireland040
Italy060
Lithuania020
Luxembourg020
Latvia020
Malta020
Netherlands051
Poland1460
Portugal060
Romania170
Sweden040
Slovenia050
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 549 members

No vote recorded, 170

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 170 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital AC Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote276 for, 317 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 482 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 86 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote273 for, 324 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 486 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 83 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote272 for, 320 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 481 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 99 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote297 for, 334 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.91 502 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 155 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment282 for, 334 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 493 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote273 for, 337 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.90 488 voters
13 Nov 2025Recital D — part 3 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote289 for, 289 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 464 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 68 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote262 for, 309 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Renew, S&Dr · shared0.90 477 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 2 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySeparate vote294 for, 282 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 548 voters
21 May 2026Paragraph 37 — part 2 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSplit vote245 for, 275 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Members, S&Dr · shared0.90 442 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184873
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: recital P — Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 184873, reference 2025/2240(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184873 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-184873,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: recital P — Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184873}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184873},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184873, reference 2025/2240(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}