Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Recital K — part 2

Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women

Vote
Recital K — part 2
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 12 Feb 2026
Result
201 for · 310 against · 25 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:44
More facts (6)
Position
vote 70 of 77 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: S&D
Official label
A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – Recital K/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0010
Dossier
2025/2240(INI)
Vote id
184867
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 201 for, 310 against, 25 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 38 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “that word”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 4Against 30Abst. 0No vote 12 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
GreensFor 0Against 42Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 7Against 95Abst. 0No vote 34 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
RenewFor 2Against 57Abst. 0No vote 16 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 122Against 7Abst. 1No vote 57 of 187Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
ECRFor 49Against 5Abst. 3No vote 22 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
PatriotsFor 7Against 44Abst. 14No vote 19 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.52
ESNFor 4Against 18Abst. 2No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.63
No groupFor 6Against 12Abst. 5No vote 9 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria005
Belgium020
Czechia610
Spain060
France0200
Hungary009
Italy150
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Poland020
Portugal010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 536 members

No vote recorded, 183

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 183 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Nov 2025Amendments 109 + 23 (voted as one) to recital 14 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAmendment295 for, 357 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 45 %r · shared0.77 492 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 1 to recital A Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economiesAmendment288 for, 294 against, 63 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.75 499 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 45 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of AuditorsAmendment258 for, 323 against, 80 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.74 493 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Amendment 2 to paragraph 47 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of AuditorsAmendment259 for, 325 against, 77 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.74 494 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 286 to recital 24 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment294 for, 337 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.72 489 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 25 to citation 2 Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member StatesAmendment238 for, 303 against, 75 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.72 475 voters
19 Sept 2024Separate vote on paragraph 2 Situation in VenezuelaSeparate vote274 for, 311 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.70 472 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 106, adding text after paragraph 16 — part 2 White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment278 for, 357 against, 40 abstained Rejected For 41 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.69 501 voters
28 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024Final231 for, 389 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 35 %r · shared0.69 495 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 4 2023 and 2024 reports on MoldovaAmendment265 for, 303 against, 84 abstained Rejected For 41 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.68 488 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184867
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Recital K — part 2 — Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 184867, reference 2025/2240(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184867 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-184867,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital K — part 2 — Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184867}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184867},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184867, reference 2025/2240(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}