Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Recital G — part 1

Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women

Vote
Recital G — part 1
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 12 Feb 2026
Result
404 for · 78 against · 69 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:42
More facts (6)
Position
vote 63 of 77 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: EPP
Official label
A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – Recital G/1
Text
Report A-10-2026-0010
Dossier
2025/2240(INI)
Vote id
184858
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 404 for, 78 against, 69 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 73 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas achieving balanced gender representation in these decision-making bodies must be a priority;’ and ‘stating parity as 50:50 representation between women and men in all their diversity,’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 33Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 104Against 1Abst. 0No vote 31 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 60Against 1Abst. 0No vote 14 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 125Against 1Abst. 9No vote 52 of 187Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
ECRFor 1Against 7Abst. 54No vote 17 of 79Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.81
PatriotsFor 27Against 39Abst. 0No vote 18 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.39
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 4Abst. 6No vote 10 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium400
Bulgaria200
Germany500
Denmark400
Estonia200
Spain100
Finland300
France1000
Ireland400
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Netherlands610
Poland100
Portugal200
Romania300
Sweden200
Slovenia200
Slovakia400

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 551 members

No vote recorded, 168

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 168 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Nov 2024Recital F — part 2 Georgia's worsening democratic crisis following the recent parliamentary elections and alleged electoral fraudSplit vote412 for, 120 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.86 467 voters
20 May 2026Separate vote on citation 25 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseSeparate vote451 for, 145 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.85 507 voters
28 Nov 2024Paragraph 10 — part 2 Georgia's worsening democratic crisis following the recent parliamentary elections and alleged electoral fraudSplit vote411 for, 121 against, 70 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.85 470 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Recital E — part 3 of 3 Public procurementSplit vote481 for, 157 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.85 487 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 22 — part 4 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanSplit vote405 for, 68 against, 115 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.84 476 voters
20 May 2026Separate vote on citation 11 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseSeparate vote464 for, 134 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.84 496 voters
30 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Women’s entrepreneurship in rural and island areas and outermost regionsFinal404 for, 102 against, 67 abstained Adopted For 71 %r · shared0.83 462 voters
10 Feb 2026Paragraph 35 — part 2 European Central Bank – annual report 2025Split vote442 for, 149 against, 55 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.83 530 voters
11 Mar 2026Paragraph 10 — part 1 Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectorsSplit vote449 for, 139 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 499 voters
11 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectorsFinal458 for, 72 against, 98 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.83 497 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184858
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Recital G — part 1 — Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 184858, reference 2025/2240(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184858 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-184858,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital G — part 1 — Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184858}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184858},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184858, reference 2025/2240(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}