Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 1, point w — part 2

Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women

Vote
Paragraph 1, point w — part 2
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 12 Feb 2026
Result
401 for · 96 against · 62 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:38
More facts (6)
Position
vote 42 of 77 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: Patriots
Official label
A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point w/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0010
Dossier
2025/2240(INI)
Vote id
184840
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 401 for, 96 against, 62 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 72 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “stress the importance of adopting consent-based rape legislation as an essential element of a comprehensive approach to combating sexual violence against women and girls; advocate for a consent-based definition of rape as a universal standard worldwide, aimed at enhancing legal protections and ensuring that sexual violence is defined by the absence of consent, rather than solely by the use of violence, coercion or threat; promote the concept that the silence of, and absence of resistance by, the victims do not constitute consent; underline that neither prior consent nor an existing relationship imply ongoing or future consent for any sexual acts; call, in this regard, on all countries to introduce a consent-based definition of rape and to guarantee survivors access to justice;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 34Against 2Abst. 0No vote 10 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
GreensFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 104Against 2Abst. 0No vote 30 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 60Against 1Abst. 0No vote 14 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 133Against 0Abst. 5No vote 49 of 187Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 6Against 11Abst. 44No vote 18 of 79Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.58
PatriotsFor 8Against 53Abst. 5No vote 18 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.70
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 3No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
No groupFor 14Against 5Abst. 5No vote 8 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria100
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1300
Denmark300
Spain400
Finland100
France300
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands400
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 559 members

No vote recorded, 160

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 160 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Paragraph 33 — part 2 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of AuditorsSplit vote473 for, 121 against, 69 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 513 voters
7 May 2025Paragraph 22 — part 2 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of AuditorsSplit vote481 for, 115 against, 66 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 514 voters
11 Mar 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of LawFinal455 for, 101 against, 74 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.89 508 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 467 voters
7 May 2025Paragraph 31 — part 2 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of AuditorsSplit vote488 for, 109 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.88 516 voters
1 Apr 2025Final vote Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks to the European Chemicals AgencyFinal482 for, 110 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.87 525 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 19 to paragraph 10 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment393 for, 109 against, 84 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.87 478 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 10 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote427 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 504 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 11 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote430 for, 157 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 500 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 101 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote449 for, 141 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.86 510 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184840
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 1, point w — part 2 — Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 184840, reference 2025/2240(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184840 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-184840,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 1, point w — part 2 — Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184840}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184840},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184840, reference 2025/2240(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}