Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 1, point u — part 7

Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women

Vote
Paragraph 1, point u — part 7
Result
381 for · 118 against · 36 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:37
More facts (6)
Position
vote 38 of 77 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens · split vote: EPP, Patriots
Official label
A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point u/7
Vote id
184831
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 381 for, 118 against, 36 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 71 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “particularly emergency contraception,”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 34Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 41Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 105Against 0Abst. 0No vote 31 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 57Against 0Abst. 0No vote 18 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 100Against 14Abst. 16No vote 57 of 187Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.65
ECRFor 5Against 48Abst. 8No vote 18 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.68
PatriotsFor 27Against 23Abst. 8No vote 26 of 84Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.20
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 8Abst. 4No vote 8 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria010
Czechia201
Germany601
Spain010
France001
Greece310
Italy010
Luxembourg010
Romania020
Slovakia111

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 535 members

No vote recorded, 184

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 184 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point al — part 3 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblySplit vote474 for, 136 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 74 %r · shared0.90 488 voters
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point al — part 5 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblySplit vote465 for, 139 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 74 %r · shared0.89 486 voters
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 85 — part 2 Impact of social media and the online environment on young peopleSplit vote403 for, 146 against, 50 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.89 462 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 28 — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote459 for, 134 against, 46 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 491 voters
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 12 — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote496 for, 94 against, 55 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 493 voters
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 12 — part 3 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote491 for, 83 against, 63 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 491 voters
17 Dec 2025Separate vote on paragraph 8 European Citizens’ Initiative ‘My voice, my choice: for safe and accessible abortion’Separate vote434 for, 138 against, 63 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.87 489 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point al — part 5 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote364 for, 120 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by S&D, Renew, Greensr · shared0.86 420 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 63 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote429 for, 153 against, 69 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.86 485 voters
8 Jul 2026Paragraph 62 — part 2 2025 Commission report on UkraineSplit vote456 for, 144 against, 40 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.86 489 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 1, point u — part 7 — Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 184831, reference 2025/2240(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184831 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-184831,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 1, point u — part 7 — Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184831}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184831},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184831, reference 2025/2240(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}